During its relationship with Visit Duluth, the town has become one of the Midwest’s most desirable places to visit – boasting all the majesty of Lake Superior, breathtaking natural terrain, and the amenities that come with a basic getaway. .
And while Visit Duluth proposed to renew its work with the city for an 87th year in 2022, President and CEO Anna Tanski made it clear in her speech to the city’s decision-making panel that there only seemed to be ‘one choice.
“(B) Lending city leadership with the expertise of Visit Duluth will provide the most direct route to elevate Duluth’s brand and drive growth now and into the future,” Tanski wrote in a proposal.
With temperatures in the ’80s, people flocked to Park Point to spend the day along the beach on Friday afternoon. Bob King / [email protected]
But documents obtained through a News Tribune data request illustrate a city administration that had grown weary of Visit Duluth. The typed and handwritten reviews revealed harsh feelings, dissatisfaction with Visit Duluth’s work, and strong articulation that the agency’s abilities suffered compared to other prospects.
Even at a time when community members and industry peers came in droves to urge the city to retain Visit Duluth, a panel composed mostly of city administrators were united as to how it received the award. proposal from Visit Duluth.
“They talk about what they have done in the past, but not necessarily what they would do in the future,” wrote one of the city’s assessors.
The criticisms were widespread and sharp. But the assessments were also semi-anonymous, hidden behind a key the city refused to decode.
With that in mind, it’s important to know the opinion makers who shaped the city council vote that in August struck a $ 1.8 million marketing deal with Edina, Minnesota-based Bellmont Partners.
Duluth Mayor Emily Larson. Contribution / City of Duluth
The seven-member panel included:
Mayor Emily Larson.
Noah Schuchman, City Administrative Director.
Jennifer Carlson, City Finance Director.
Kate Van Daele, city spokesperson.
Adam Fulton, deputy director of the planning and economic development division at Duluth.
Arik Forsman, City Councilor.
Amanda Ashbach, City Purchasing Agent.
Throughout this story, it will not be clear which assessment passages to assign to which person. But the ratings sounded consistent anyway. On a 100-point scale used in the final assessment, none of the panelists rated Visit Duluth higher than 75, and one issued the equivalent of a report card of a D-less (55). Conversely, Bellmont Partners obtained an average of 93.
Reviewers’ issues with Visit Duluth weren’t limited to one thing or another. Instead, themes emerged that strayed wildly from opinions such as that belonging to Briana Johnson, a former Visit Duluth board chair, whose sentiment was echoed throughout the August outcry against the city’s decision.
People see the lights at Bentleyville’s opening night at Bayfront Festival Park in Duluth on Saturday. The Holiday Light Show is now open daily at 5 p.m. until Monday, December 26, 2016, including Thanksgiving, Christmas Eve and Christmas Eve. (Clint Austin / [email protected])
“Duluth tourism has seen unprecedented growth under Visit Duluth over the past two decades, I can’t help but wonder why the effectiveness of the organization is in question at this point,” Johnson wrote in the one of the many letters received by the city.
But the reviewers questioned Visit Duluth, starting with the historical concept of Visit Duluth itself.
“This group does not have the marketing power and efficiency of a large corporation,” wrote one of the seven panelists. “This is a small group that depends primarily on the city for funding and the city is its only client.”
From there, the reviews broke into themes:
A lack of communication and understanding of who the boss is.
High personnel costs in relation to the results.
Distrust of the reach and creativity of Visit Duluth.
And a lack of data and analytical development within Visit Duluth.
U.S. Brigadier Niagara blows a cannon during the Sailing Festival Sunday August 11, 2019 at Canal Park. Ellen Schmidt/[email protected]
On the subject of communication: “Their issues are all relational,” wrote a panelist. Another panelist was “concerned about the global ego”, which they said “would hurt financial growth”.
“The existing board structure can create conflicts with who (the) primary client is – city or council (visit Duluth),” wrote another panelist.
It was a sentiment expressed on several occasions, including a panelist describing the city as a business.
“They don’t seem to understand what the relationship is between a customer and the business to keep the customer happy and aware of their efforts,” the reviewer wrote.
The same reviewer said Visit Duluth appeared to be “playing favorites” and had “strained relationships across the industry”.
Visit Duluth CEO Anna Tanski poses for a photo on February 19, 2014. Steve Kuchera / File / Duluth News Tribune
Visit Duluth’s Tanski declined to comment last week in defense of his agency. Instead, she cited a need for discretion as Visit Duluth continues to seek a $ 400,000 contract to manage conventions and visitor center operations for the city.
When asked if there has been any progress in this direction, Schuchman said last week: “We are working in good faith to reach an agreement.”
He declined to address the many questions raised by the written assessments.
On staffing, Visit Duluth presented a budget of $ 758,500 for operational expenses, compared to $ 987,000 for marketing and visitor services.
“The budget (is) more staff-intensive than other agencies, leaving less money for marketing,” wrote one panelist.
Regarding the analysis, Visit Duluth has been criticized for being behind in analyzing the data.
Best friends Lexi Schelde (left) and Rylee Zolin-Greek, both from Duluth, examine and smash rocks for geodes and crystals while hunting the same ones – plus agates and sea glass – along of Canal Park beach under a large, passing cloud Wednesday afternoon. Bob King / [email protected]
“(M) etrics and goals (are) still being developed despite decades of history,” said one reviewer.
Another called him “unhappy” Visit Duluth did not have fully developed analytical processes.
“Looks like they’re coming in late to establish measures,” another said, while another panelist said Visit Duluth couldn’t share anything about the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, “in part because that I don’t think they’ve tracked the impacts before. ”
On the theme of creativity, one panelist called Visit Duluth “more of a direct approach to the development of attractions and the quantity of visitors”. Another panelist said Visit Duluth was good at “filling heads in beds and reserving spaces,” but apparently not enough.
Another said that “the creative examples shared (were) not as dynamic as other agencies”. Others said Visit Duluth lacked scope or clarity on how to reach new audiences.
“(Visit Duluth) has repeatedly referred to a” limited market, “indicating a limited perspective on who can or cannot visit the city,” wrote one panelist.
In the end, Visit Duluth’s pitch for another year of city marketing work suffered for its history, which is based on a membership model.
“In general, (there was a) clear feeling that the proposed approach would not change,” said one panelist. “(There is) little point in changing the way they approached this work, which tends to leave out many voices. ”
In contrast, Bellmont Partners’ reviews were complimentary, citing “fantastic past results with clients”.
Panelists glossed over the risk of “getting lost in the crowd” at a large agency, in favor of details like “in-house videographers” (not something Visit Duluth offers) and a “personalized dashboard to track. performance measures “.
“Team members traveled to Duluth and shared photos of their trips to Duluth during the presentation,” wrote an impressed panelist.
Bellmont Partners has started preparing to take over as the city’s marketing arm and will function “fully” in that role on Jan. 1, Schuchman said, calling it premature to guess the new approach to come.
A final comment from a panelist about Bellmont Partners seemed to hit home and echoed the anger of people who scoffed at the town’s decision, saying: “(The) only downside is that they’re not from Duluth. ”